Face-to-face teaching in the Physiotherapy course: lessons left by the pandemic

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22421/1517-7130/es.2022v23.e883

Keywords:

Learning, Teaching, Physical Therapy Modalities

Abstract

With the COVID-19 pandemic, teaching needed to be suddenly changed to the emergency
remote teaching format and after the return to face-to-face teaching there were changes. To
present the professor's perception of the contributions of emergency remote teaching to their
professional role in the face-to-face model. This is a qualitative research with interviews with
professors who taught in the Physiotherapy course at the Midwest State University during the
emergency remote teaching. Ten professors were interviewed. Learning was characterized in its
knowledge construction process, models involving active methodologies were the most used,
human contact gained relevance in the comments. All professors transformed their didactic
action. The emergency remote teaching model promoted changes in the way of teaching and
teaching models based on active methodologies were more incorporated into the face-to-face
model.

Author Biography

Josiane Lopes, Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste

Pós-doutora em Ciências da Reabilitação. Docente do curso de Fisioterapia da Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste. Guarapuava, Paraná.

References

Carvaho HP, Soares MV, Carvalho SML, Telles TMCK. O professor e o ensino remoto: tecnologias ativas na sala de aula. Educação Pública, 2022.

Hodges C, Moore S, Lockee B, Trust T, Bond A. The difference between emergency remote teaching and Online Learning. 2020. Educause [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Mar10]. Available from: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning#fn1.

Machado FB, Costa NM, Gomes ERV, Silva FCM, Feitosa JAF. Metodologias ativas de aprendizagem: avanços e desafios no ensino superior. REDES. 2022; 2(1).

Minayo MCS. Pesquisa social: teoria, método e criatividade. Petrópolis: Vozes; 1999.31p

Monteiro SS. (Re)inventar educação escolar no Brasil em tempos da COVID-19. Revista Augustus.2020;25(51): 237-254.

Moran JM, Masetto MT, Behrens MA. Novas tecnologias e mediação pedagógica. São Paulo: Papirus, 2001.173p

Pasini CGD, Carvalho E, Almeida LHC. Educação híbrida em tempos de pandemia: algumas considerações. Observatório Socioeconômico da COVID-19. FAPERGS.2020

Scuisato DAS. Mídias na educação: uma proposta de potencialização e dinamização na prática docente com a utilização de ambientes virtuais de aprendizagem coletiva e colaborativa. [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 dez 27]. Available from: http://www.diaadiaeducacao.pr.gov.br/ portals/pde/arquivos/2500-8.pdf.

UNESCO. A Comissão Futuros da Educação da Unesco apela ao planejamento antecipado contra o aumento das desigualdades após a COVID-19. Paris: Unesco, [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Abr 16]. Available from: https://www.unesco.org/pt/articles/comissao-futuros-da-educacao-

Published

2022-11-11

How to Cite

1.
Lopes J. Face-to-face teaching in the Physiotherapy course: lessons left by the pandemic . Espac. Saude [Internet]. 2022 Nov. 11 [cited 2024 Nov. 24];23. Available from: https://espacoparasaude.fpp.edu.br/index.php/espacosaude/article/view/883

Issue

Section

Artigos

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.